In this video we discuss trouble shooting the modification of gold screen printed electrodes (Au-SPE).
Troubleshooting Voltammetry on Screen-Printed Gold Electrodes: A Step-by-Step Guide
Screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) are widely used in electrochemical sensing due to their convenience and reproducibility. However, interpreting voltammetry data—especially on gold SPEs—can sometimes be tricky. In this blog post, we’ll break down a real-world troubleshooting case involving voltammetry on gold SPEs for ATP detection, highlighting common pitfalls and how to address them.
The Problem: Unexpected Peaks in Voltammetry
A researcher was attempting ATP detection using gold screen-printed electrodes modified with EDC/NHS coupling and luciferin. However, their cyclic voltammograms (CVs) showed unusual features:
-
Symmetrical oxidation/reduction peaks around 0 V – These were later identified as silver (Ag/AgCl) redox activity, likely from contamination.
-
A large reduction wave at negative potentials – Possibly oxygen reduction, complicated by instrument limitations.
-
Minimal changes after surface modification – Suggesting poor electrode functionalization.
Let’s dissect these issues one by one.
1. Silver Contamination on the Working Electrode
Observation:
The CV showed symmetrical peaks near 0 V, characteristic of surface-bound redox reactions. Given the SPE’s Ag/AgCl reference electrode, the most probable explanation is silver migration onto the gold working electrode.
Possible Causes:
-
Manufacturing defect: Silver ink from the reference electrode leaked during production.
-
User-induced contamination: Silver dissolution during experiments (e.g., from improper storage or harsh electrolytes).
Solution:
-
Test a fresh, unused electrode to check for inherent contamination.
-
If contamination appears only after use, review handling protocols (e.g., avoid chloride-rich buffers that dissolve Ag).
2. Strange Reduction Wave at Negative Potentials
Observation:
A large, distorted reduction wave appeared at negative potentials, flattening at extreme values.
Diagnosis:
-
Likely oxygen reduction, but the plateau suggests compliance voltage issues—the potentiostat couldn’t deliver enough current due to:
-
A small counter electrode (common in commercial SPEs).
-
A low-power potentiostat (e.g., USB-powered systems).
-
Solution:
-
Use a potentiostat with higher compliance voltage.
-
If stuck with the same setup, limit the scan range to avoid extreme potentials.
3. No Clear Evidence of Successful Electrode Modification
Observation:
After EDC/NHS coupling and luciferin attachment, the CV barely changed—unexpected if the surface was properly modified.
Possible Issues:
-
No prior self-assembled monolayer (SAM): EDC/NHS activates carboxyl groups, but you first need a SAM (e.g., thiolated carboxylic acid) on gold.
-
Poor surface cleaning: Gold must be pristine for SAM formation. Contaminants (like the observed silver) can block modification.
Best Practices:
-
Pre-modification checks:
-
Run CVs in 5 mM ferrocyanide to verify electrode cleanliness. A reversible redox peak confirms a clean, active surface.
-
-
Step-by-step characterization:
-
After SAM formation, the ferrocyanide peaks should decrease and shift due to blocked electron transfer.
-
Repeat after each modification step (e.g., EDC/NHS, luciferin) to confirm changes.
-
Key Takeaways
-
Check for contamination – Silver peaks suggest a dirty electrode or manufacturing flaw.
-
Mind your potentiostat’s limits – Compliance voltage issues can distort voltammetry.
-
Validate modifications – Use redox probes (e.g., ferrocyanide) to track surface changes.
Final Tip: Choosing the Right Electrodes
Not all SPEs are created equal! At Zimmer & Peacock, we manufacture and extensively test our gold SPEs, ensuring reliable performance for biosensing. If you’re struggling with inconsistent results, consider switching to electrodes designed and validated by active researchers.
